B.001: The Kissed Girl Aesthetic - Trial

Case #: B.001

Incident Date: 11/07/2025

Location: Court of Taste

Suspect: The Kissed Girl Aesthetic

Violation Code: Baciando Hourglass Decree, Decree II Cycle 2.26

Officer: Maison 04 - Mr. Kiss

Recommendation: Trial Required

Evidence Submitted: Witness testimony

Case: The Republic of Aesthetic Law vs. The Kissed Girl Aesthetic

Filing Date: 11/09/2025

Presiding Judge: Mr. Her

Charge: Makeup is not melting. The face has not been kissed.

Filed By: Detective Mr. Passion

Status: Pending

Session Type: Trial

Final Report: Trial has started - Day 1

Division: Beauty & Aesthetic Bureau

Opening Remark

The Republic has observed the matter for four days.

Four days of:

• Faces decorated like holiday pastries,

• Blush sitting on the cheeks like tax liens,

• Lips trembling with the emotional range of unbuttered toast.

At this time, the Republic finds: We are no longer investigating a mistake. We are investigating a pattern. And patterns have intent.

The Charge: The People vs. The Decorated Girl Era

Charge: The face has not been kissed. Blush has been placed, not felt. Warmth has been performed, not lived.

This is a Class II Aesthetic Offense Under Republic Law because:

• Makeup must melt.

• Emotion must appear.

• The face must look like it belongs to a person, not an advertisement.

The Republic reminds all citizens that: We are not ornaments. We are organisms.

Primary Evidence

After extensive review, the Republic presents the following findings:

1. Blush is being applied as a warning signal. Not a memory.

2. Complexions appear "enhanced" but emotionally absent. The aesthetic is present. The woman is missing.

3. Faces demonstrate technique, not intimacy. A skillset has replaced a self.

4. Time exposure indicates chronic avoidance of warmth. (Clinical term: Afraid to look like they have been loved before).

Witness Statements (Summarized)

Multiple Duques testified:

"I know how to do my makeup. I just don't know how to feel beautiful."

Which is equivalent to saying:

"I plated the meal beautifully. And forgot to taste it."

Legal Position of the Republic

We do not criminalize decoration. We criminalize emotionless beauty.

Beauty must not resemble:

• A costume,

• A storefront mannequin,

• or a YouTube thumbnail optimized for retention metrics.

Beauty must resemble:

• Heat.

• Breath.

• A memory you can't explain but can feel.

This is the doctrine of the Republic. This is not up for debate.

Conclusion

The Republic hereby moves the case to Trial.

Chambers will open tomorrow.

The charge stands: The face has not been kissed. And the Republic intends to prove it.

Proceedings will take place in:

The Hall of Taste, Courtroom I Presiding Judge: Mr. Her Lead Prosecutor: Mr. Passion Defendant Counsel: Mr. Vero

Court convenes tomorrow.

Signed:

Detective Mr. Tempo

Beauty & Aesthetic Bureau

Republic of Aesthetic Law

Razzato Code of Enforcement: https://razzato.com/style-infractions-unit Inbacio Codex of Aesthetic: https://inbacio.com/civil-crime-of-taste Talerce Doctrine of Duality: https://talerce.com/soft-offense Baciando Hourglass Decree: https://baciando.com/temporal-infraction